The Emperor's New Clothes - part 1

Research I did based on FOI requests reveals the full hoax of PCR tests and SARS-COV-2 as a new pathogen

In the coming series of articles I will elaborate on why there is no scientific validity to the claim that SARS-COV-2 has ever been properly isolated and purified and hence the PCR testing for this virus is meaningless and could not have any validity for public health policy nor for taking basic human rights.

Here is a summary of my work.

The corona tests using the PCR method were used as a main tool by health authorities around the world to determine and label people as "sick", "verified" or "positive" for corona, even when they were without symptoms. The great effort and money invested in purchasing the test kits and creating campaigns to convince and sometimes even coerce the general public to be tested frequently, in many cases as a condition for maintaining a normal life and maintaining rights, resulted in the extent of these tests being unprecedented in history. This mechanism made it possible to create a false representation of an erupting epidemic, which supposedly justified the multitude of aggressive actions taken by the government in the name of the state of emergency, and this, despite a serious ethical violation natural law and human rights, including freedom of occupation freedom of movement.

The PCR tests, according to the inventor of the technology, Kari Mullis, were never intended to be used as a tool for diagnosing diseases. At most, these can be used as an aid in diagnosis. Many scientists have pointed out the multitude of problems with the PCR tests, which have never gone through an orderly, controlled and established process to qualify them as an exclusive diagnostic tool for Corona.

In order to understand in more depth which test kits are used in Israel and what is the scientific basis on which the Ministry of Health relied in order to qualify them as an exclusive diagnostic tool, I contacted the Ministry of Health through the Freedom of Information Law route with a request to receive information about these tests.
The Ministry of Health did not respond to my request, thereby violating the Freedom of Information Law.

In order to extract the information, I had to invest a lot of time and money and filed an administrative appeal to Court. The information that was eventually received from the Ministry of Health confirms the claims of Kari Mullis and others: - The PCR tests are not suitable for diagnosing corona, and the test results have no clinical significance. Thus, they cannot be used as a legitimate and legal tool that gives the state the authority to force people into a “public health” policy while taking away their rights.

According to the information provided by the Ministry of Health, most of which included references to the scientific literature, it can be assumed and proven that the PCR tests are based on a type of pseudo-science at best, and fraud under the guise of science at worst. This claim stems from three conclusions that arise in light of the analysis of the information provided:

1. The PCR tests have never undergone a scientific validation process against a gold standard, which would qualify them as a central or sole tool for corona diagnosis. All that is done is validation against other PCR-based test kits.

2. The virus known as SARS-COV-2 - has never been isolated and purified in a laboratory directly from a living person who is sick with corona. Therefore, it cannot be determined that it is the causal factor of the corona disease. Further to this finding, it is important to understand that without this process it is not possible to sequence the virus in its entirety and to produce a PCR-based detection kit based on this information. In fact, no controlled scientific experiment has ever been done on living organisms, certainly not on humans, in which they proved that the same SARS-COV-2 virus is the cause of the corona disease. No controlled scientific experiment has been conducted that demonstrates transmission of the disease agent between humans in any way, and as a result of this - the Koch or Rivers postulates - which are necessary to establish the scientific theory that has been established (wrongly and misleadingly) among scientists, doctors and the general public, have not been proven.

The information that the Ministry of Health provided and the research that I and others conducted in the scientific literature indicate that all that was actually carried out was a long series of experiments in Petri dishes on cell cultures (accompanied by computer work for the purpose of assembling the genetic puzzle that was collected) when in most cases these were monkey kidney cells that indirectly demonstrate a disease agent which causes the death of these cell cultures (known in the literature as the Cytopathic Effect). Controlled scientific experiments on humans or genetically related animals have never been carried out. The entire narrative is based on publications of laboratory work in petri dishes. Strangely, there is almost no criticism among virologists and researchers of the accepted model in virology research. The lack of skepticism and scrutiny among scientists reminds the story "The Emperor's New Clothes", or to a large extent the expression - "the scientific consensus".

3. The PCR kits used in Israel were deliberately calibrated and adjusted in order to obtain a high rate of positive results, by using an excessively high number of amplification cycles, far above what is accepted in the scientific literature (over 36 rounds, and sometimes even over 40 rounds). Moreover - frequent changes in the testing policy created situations in which only the "non-vaccinated" as defined (without proper scientific and research basis) were tested for in certain periods of time.

The money invested in the purchase of the PCR kits is equivalent to the budget of a large government office(In Israel). These amounts could have been put to another use for the benefit of the health of the citizens of Israel and society as a whole, and to provide a broad health response, which includes physical, cognitive, emotional and social support, instead of spending these funds on PCR tests that have no scientific or clinical validity.

The full article which will be published on future posts, provides an extensive explanation of the findings of the Freedom of Information request, while analyzing the dubious scientific practices used in the world of virology. This article invites its readers to deeply understand the meaning of the findings and look at the naked truth: the lie of the "scientific consensus". As you will see later in the future posts, and as I hope you will understand - we must learn a lesson from this entire affair and not allow it to repeat itself in the future.